United States v. Titus T. Moore, United States of America v. Vaughn R. Bradley, United States of America v. Michael E. Wickman, Robert Scott Moreland, Etc. v. United States

951 F.2d 166
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedDecember 2, 1991
Docket90-2534
StatusPublished

This text of 951 F.2d 166 (United States v. Titus T. Moore, United States of America v. Vaughn R. Bradley, United States of America v. Michael E. Wickman, Robert Scott Moreland, Etc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Titus T. Moore, United States of America v. Vaughn R. Bradley, United States of America v. Michael E. Wickman, Robert Scott Moreland, Etc. v. United States, 951 F.2d 166 (8th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

951 F.2d 166

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Titus T. MOORE, Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Vaughn R. BRADLEY, Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Michael E. WICKMAN, Appellant.
Robert Scott MORELAND, etc., Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

Nos. 90-2534, 90-2535, 90-2958 and 90-5375.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Dec. 2, 1991.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, Donald D. Aslop, Chief Judge.

Robert Scott Moreland, Duluth, Minn., for appellant.

Lynn A. Zentner, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellee.

ORDER

On July 29, 1991, the court notified the parties that rehearing en banc had been granted in these four cases. Rehearing shall be stayed in Moore and Bradley, as those cases raise the jurisdiction issue as to whether the attorney general or the sentencing judge has jurisdiction to give credit on the sentence. This stay shall remain in effect pending hearing and disposition of United States v. Wilson, 916 F.2d 1115 (6th Cir.1990), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 48, 116 L.Ed.2d 26 (1991).

Moreland and Wickman, however, also raise a jail time credit issue. These two cases shall be argued before the court en banc on January 6, 1992, at 9:00 a.m. in St. Louis, Missouri. The parties' arguments shall be limited to the issue of jail time credit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Richard Wilson
916 F.2d 1115 (Sixth Circuit, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
951 F.2d 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-titus-t-moore-united-states-of-america-v-vaughn-r-ca8-1991.