United States v. Tito Knox

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 3, 2026
• Docket: 25-6906
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6906 Doc: 7 Filed: 03/03/2026 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-6906

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TITO LEMONT KNOX,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (6:06-cr-00269-DCC-1)

Submitted: February 26, 2026 Decided: March 3, 2026

Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tito Lemont Knox, Appellant Pro Se. Maxwell B. Cauthen, III, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6906 Doc: 7 Filed: 03/03/2026 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Tito Lemont Knox appeals the district court’s October 8, 2025, opinion and order

denying Knox’s motion to terminate his conditional release and supervision, provided for

by 18 U.S.C. § 4243(f). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the

informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Knox’s informal brief does not challenge

the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s

order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is

an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues

preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the appealed-from order.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED