United States v. Tito Burney, Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJuly 6, 2018
Docket17-13158
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Tito Burney, Jr. (United States v. Tito Burney, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Tito Burney, Jr., (11th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

Case: 17-13158 Date Filed: 07/06/2018 Page: 1 of 8

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________

No. 17-13158 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr-00487-SDM-AEP-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TITO BURNEY, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________

(July 6, 2018)

Before MARTIN, JILL PRYOR and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Case: 17-13158 Date Filed: 07/06/2018 Page: 2 of 8

After pleading guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation

of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2), defendant Tito Burney Jr. appeals his

total 33-month sentence. On appeal, Burney argues that the district court erred in

applying a four-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) for possessing

a firearm in connection with another felony offense. After review, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND FACTS

A. Offense Conduct

On February 26, 2016, police officers in St. Petersburg, Florida observed

Burney standing beside a road with a bag of marijuana protruding from his front

pocket. When the officers searched Burney incident to his arrest, they found a

loaded 9mm pistol in his front pocket. At the time of his arrest, Burney was a

convicted felon, having been convicted in state court of grand theft of a motor

vehicle in November 2015.

In November 2016, a federal grand jury indicted Burney on one count of

being a felon in possession of a firearm, namely the 9mm pistol found in his

pocket. On January 10, 2017, while Burney was on pretrial release, officers

observed Burney and others in a Facebook Live video possessing guns and making

threatening remarks. As a consequence, on January 12, 2017, Burney was arrested

for violating a special condition of his pretrial release by possessing a firearm.

2 Case: 17-13158 Date Filed: 07/06/2018 Page: 3 of 8

On the same day, agents with the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,

Firearms, and Explosives (“ATF”) searched Burney’s home and discovered three

guns, 30.4 grams of marijuana individually packaged in 13 separate plastic bags,

and a digital scale next to the marijuana. Burney’s mother told police officers that

one of the firearms recovered during the search—a sawed-off shotgun—belonged

to her, but said the other two guns likely belonged to Burney. Burney admitted

that one of the two remaining guns was the gun he had possessed in the Facebook

Live video and that both guns were given to him by two other men.

B. Sentencing

After Burney entered his guilty plea, the presentence investigation report

(“PSI”) recommended a four-level increase in Burney’s offense level, pursuant to

U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B), because he had possessed a firearm in connection with

the felony offense of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. The PSI

stated that when Burney possessed the firearm on February 26, 2016, officers

“found 22.6 grams of marijuana which was packaged in eight small Ziploc bags in

the defendant’s front right pocket.” The PSI further stated, that when officers

searched Burney’s home on January 12, 2017, they found three firearms, “30.4

grams of marijuana which was packaged for distribution in 13 separate plastic

bags, and a digital scale next to the baggies of marijuana.”

3 Case: 17-13158 Date Filed: 07/06/2018 Page: 4 of 8

Before and at sentencing, Burney objected to, among other things, the

proposed four-level increase, arguing that there was no evidence that he had

possessed the marijuana with the intent to sell it and that his marijuana possession

was a misdemeanor under state law. At the sentencing hearing, the government

presented evidence in support of the four-level increase, including: (1) a DVD

recording of the Facebook Live stream; and (2) the testimony of St. Petersburg

police officer Brian Prest, who arrested Burney in February 2016, and ATF special

agent Scott Boshek, who searched Burney’s home in January 2017 and interviewed

Burney and his mother after the search. Burney presented testimony from his

mother.

After hearing the evidence, the district court found that it was more probable

than not that Burney intended to sell the marijuana and overruled Burney’s

objection to the four-level increase for possessing a firearm in connection with

another felony offense. Based on its resolution of Burney’s objections, the district

court found that Burney’s total offense level was 17 and his criminal history

category was III, which resulted in an advisory guidelines range of 30 to 37

months’ imprisonment. After hearing argument from the parties, the district court

found no reason to vary from that advisory range and imposed a 33-month

sentence.

4 Case: 17-13158 Date Filed: 07/06/2018 Page: 5 of 8

II. SECTION 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) FIREARM INCREASE

Section 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) provides for a four-level increase if the defendant

“used or possessed any firearm or ammunition in connection with another felony

offense; or possessed or transferred any firearm or ammunition with knowledge,

intent, or reason to believe that it would be used or possessed in connection with

another felony offense.” U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B). Application Note 14 to

§ 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) explains that the increase can be applied “if the firearm or

ammunition facilitated, or had the potential of facilitating, another felony offense.”

U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1 cmt. n.14(A). The commentary further provides that the increase

applies “in the case of a drug trafficking offense in which a firearm is found in

close proximity to drugs, drug-manufacturing materials, or drug paraphernalia . . . .

because the presence of the firearm has the potential of facilitating another felony

offense or another offense.” Id. § 2K2.1 cmt. n.14(B).

This Court has determined that “[a] firearm found in close proximity to

drugs or drug-related items simply ‘has’—without any requirement for additional

evidence—the potential to facilitate the drug offense.” See United States v.

Carillo-Ayala, 713 F.3d 82, 92 (11th Cir. 2013).1

1 A district court’s finding that a firearm was possessed in connection with another felony offense is a factual finding that this Court reviews for clear error. United States v. Whitfield, 50 F.3d 947, 949 & n. 8 (11th Cir. 1995). To conclude the district court’s finding was clearly erroneous, this Court must have a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake was committed.” United States v. Rothenberg, 610 F.3d 621, 624 (11th Cir. 2010) (quotation marks omitted). 5 Case: 17-13158 Date Filed: 07/06/2018 Page: 6 of 8

III. BURNEY’S CLAIM

The district court did not clearly err in applying the four-level enhancement

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Whitfield
50 F.3d 947 (Eleventh Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Rothenberg
610 F.3d 621 (Eleventh Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Arturo Carillo-Ayala
713 F.3d 82 (Eleventh Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Tito Burney, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tito-burney-jr-ca11-2018.