United States v. Tinsley

73 F. 369, 19 C.C.A. 515, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2656
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 28, 1895·No. No. 94·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SIMONTON, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the circuit court of the United States for the Western district of Virginia. The plaintiff below, appellee here, supervisor of elections, brought his action at law against the United States for certain items of services claimed by him and disallowed by the first comptroller of the treasury. The cause was heard by the court, and the greater part of his claim allowed the petitioner. The United States filed its petition for an appeal, which was allowed, and the cause thus comes here. This being an action on a legal demand,-and properly an action at law, errors in the court below cannot be reviewed in this court except by writ of error. Act March 3, 1887, c. 359, § 9 (1 Supp. Rev. St. 561); U. S. v. Fletcher, 8 C. C. A. 453, 60 Fed. 53. The cause coming here by way of appeal, this court has no jurisdiction over it. Chase v. U. S., 15 Sup. Ct. 174. It is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Tinsley, 73 F. 369, 19 C.C.A. 515, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2656 (4th Cir. 1895).

73 F. 369 (United States v. Tinsley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Wilmington v. Ricaud
90 F. 212 (Fourth Circuit, 1898)