United States v. Tinsley

177 F. App'x 870
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 17, 2006·No. No. 05-15995; D.C. Docket No. 04-00110-CR-WS·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Michelle Tinsley in this appeal from a revocation of probation, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Tinsley’s probation and resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Tinsley, 177 F. App'x 870 (11th Cir. 2006).

177 F. App'x 870 (United States v. Tinsley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)