United States v. Tinajero

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 7, 2000·No. 99-10349·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-10349

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MANUEL TINAJERO, Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:98-CR-057-1-C

--------------------

December 29, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Manuel Tinajero (“Tinajero”) appeals from his sentence following his jury trial conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the district court erred by adjusting his offense level upward two levels for obstruction of justice, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1. Specifically, Tinajero argues that the district court clearly erred in finding his failure to appear for trial willful. We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and we

*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 99-10349

-2-

conclude that the district court did not err in applying § 3C1.1.

See United States v. O’Callaghan, 106 F.3d 1221, 1223 (5th Cir. 1997).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Tinajero, (5th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Tinajero (United States v. Tinajero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Sam Denson O'Callaghan Dee Ann West
106 F.3d 1221 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)