United States v. Tinajero
This text of United States v. Tinajero (United States v. Tinajero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-10349 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MANUEL TINAJERO,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:98-CR-057-1-C -------------------- December 29, 1999
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Manuel Tinajero (“Tinajero”) appeals from his sentence
following his jury trial conviction for illegal re-entry after
deportation, 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the district
court erred by adjusting his offense level upward two levels for
obstruction of justice, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1.
Specifically, Tinajero argues that the district court clearly
erred in finding his failure to appear for trial willful. We
have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and we
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-10349 -2-
conclude that the district court did not err in applying § 3C1.1.
See United States v. O’Callaghan, 106 F.3d 1221, 1223 (5th Cir.
1997).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Tinajero, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tinajero-ca5-2000.