United States v. Timothy Ehlers
This text of 551 F. App'x 307 (United States v. Timothy Ehlers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Timothy Wayne Ehlers appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the condition of supervised release requiring him to participate in a mental health program. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Ehlers contends that the district court abused its discretion and imposed a substantively unreasonable supervised release condition because he has not been diagnosed with a mental illness, the only evidence regarding his mental health was anecdotal, his offense lacked “any mental health component,” and his substance abuse problem provides an alternate explanation for his behavior. We disagree. The record supports the district court’s conclusion that Ehlers may benefit from a mental health program. The condition is reasonably related to the goals of protecting the public and providing Ehlers with necessary treatment, involves no greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary to achieve those goals, and is consistent with the policy statement in U.S.S.G. § 5D1.3(d)(5). See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d); United States v. Lopez, 258 F.3d 1053, 1056-57 (9th Cir.2001).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
551 F. App'x 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-timothy-ehlers-ca9-2013.