United States v. Timothy Eddington

548 F. App'x 914
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Timothy Eddington. Read the opinion of the Court — 520 F. App'x 214
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 20, 2013·No. 19-4122·Unpublished

Opinion

*915 Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Wayne Eddington was convicted in a 2008 jury trial of conspiracy to commit bank robbery and related charges. This court affirmed the convictions on appeal. United States v. Eddington, 416 Fed.Appx. 258 (4th Cir.2011) (Nos.08-4798/4799). His 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2018) motion to vacate has also been rejected. See United States v. Eddington, 520 Fed.Appx. 214 (4th Cir.2013) (No. 12-7989). In these consolidated appeals, Eddington challenges district court orders denying his motion for discovery and motion to remove the district court’s separation order. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Eddington, No. 0:07-cr-01149-CMC-1 (D.S.C. Oct. 1, 2013; Oct. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

The district court’s criminal judgment ordered that Eddington be housed in a different institution from his son and other codefendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Timothy Eddington, 548 F. App'x 914 (4th Cir. 2013).

548 F. App'x 914 (United States v. Timothy Eddington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Timothy Eddington
520 F. App'x 214 (Fourth Circuit, 2013)
Williams v. Mathena
416 F. App'x 258 (Fourth Circuit, 2011)