United States v. Timothy Cofield

48 F.3d 1217, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11056, 1995 WL 106177
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 16, 1995·No. 94-7088·Published

Opinion

48 F.3d 1217
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Timothy COFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-7088.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 19, 1995.
Decided Feb. 16, 1995.

Timothy Cofield, Appellant Pro Se.

Mark Joseph Hulkower, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Appellant's Motion for the Production and Conveyance of Trial Transcripts and Related Documents. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Cofield, No. CR-92-167-A (E.D. Va. Sept. 9, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Timothy Cofield, 48 F.3d 1217, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11056, 1995 WL 106177 (4th Cir. 1995).

48 F.3d 1217 (United States v. Timothy Cofield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.