United States v. Timothy C. Pigford Clara B. Pigford

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Timothy C. Pigford Clara B. Pigford

57 F.3d 1067, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21776, 1995 WL 352500

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 13, 1995

Docket94-1931

StatusPublished

This text of 57 F.3d 1067 (United States v. Timothy C. Pigford Clara B. Pigford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Timothy C. Pigford Clara B. Pigford, 57 F.3d 1067, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21776, 1995 WL 352500 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

57 F.3d 1067
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Timothy C. PIGFORD; Clara B. Pigford, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 94-1931.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 13, 1995.

Timothy C. Pigford, Clara B. Pigford, Appellants Pro Se. Eileen Coffey Moore, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order granting Appellee's motion for summary judgment in this civil forfeiture action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Pigford, No. CA92-174 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 14, 1994).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We also deny Appellants' motion for appointment of counsel

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

57 F.3d 1067
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Timothy C. PIGFORD; Clara B. Pigford, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 94-1931.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 13, 1995.

Timothy C. Pigford, Clara B. Pigford, Appellants Pro Se. Eileen Coffey Moore, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order granting Appellee's motion for summary judgment in this civil forfeiture action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Pigford, No. CA92-174 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 14, 1994).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We also deny Appellants' motion for appointment of counsel

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 F.3d 1067, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21776, 1995 WL 352500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-timothy-c-pigford-clara-b-pigford-ca4-1995.