United States v. Timmie Cole, Sr.
This text of 371 F. App'x 693 (United States v. Timmie Cole, Sr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this appeal following remand, federal inmate Timmie Durrell Cole, Sr., appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his motion for return of property. Having carefully reviewed the district court’s factual findings for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo, see United States v. United See. Sav. Bank, 394 F.3d 564, 567 (8th Cir.2004) (per curiam) (standards of review), we conclude the district court’s decision was correct, see Nunley v. Dep’t of Justice, 425 F.3d 1132, 1139 (8th Cir.2005) (government afforded inmate due process when it sent forfeiture notice to him in care of his attorney). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
371 F. App'x 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-timmie-cole-sr-ca8-2009.