United States v. Tillman

421 F. App'x 289
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Tillman. Read the opinion of the Court — 413 F. App'x 562
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 6, 2011·No. 10-7499, 10-7501·Unpublished

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamerson Devoir Tillman and James Tillman seek to appeal their convictions and sentences. In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within fourteen days after the entry of judgment. Fed. RApp. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir.1985).

The district court entered the judgments on September 25, 2001. The notices of appeal were filed on October 25, 2010. Because Jamerson Tillman and James Tillman failed to file timely notices of appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Tillman, 421 F. App'x 289 (4th Cir. 2011).

421 F. App'x 289 (United States v. Tillman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Jose v. Reyes
759 F.2d 351 (Fourth Circuit, 1985)