United States v. Tillery

575 F. App'x 182
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 13, 2014
DocketNo. 14-6750
StatusPublished

This text of 575 F. App'x 182 (United States v. Tillery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Tillery, 575 F. App'x 182 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Carter Tillery seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to recuse the district judge in his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion proceeding. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Tillery seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
575 F. App'x 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tillery-ca4-2014.