United States v. Tiffany & Co.

153 F. 969, 83 C.C.A. 81, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4484
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Tiffany & Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 151 F. 473
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided February 4, 1907·No. No. 22·Published

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The application to serve and file a supplemental and amended answer is denied, because we deem the application unnecessary, as. the Circuit Court has ample power to grant such relief, and to suspend the trial until the importer, by payment of the duties assessed, may put itself in position to try the question as to classification before the Board of General Appraisers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Tiffany & Co., 153 F. 969, 83 C.C.A. 81, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4484 (2d Cir. 1907).

153 F. 969 (United States v. Tiffany & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.