United States v. Tiffany & Co.

153 F. 969, 83 C.C.A. 81, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4484
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedFebruary 4, 1907
DocketNo. 22
StatusPublished

This text of 153 F. 969 (United States v. Tiffany & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Tiffany & Co., 153 F. 969, 83 C.C.A. 81, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4484 (2d Cir. 1907).

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The application to serve and file a supplemental and amended answer is denied, because we deem the application unnecessary, as. the Circuit Court has ample power to grant such relief, and to suspend the trial until the importer, by payment of the duties assessed, may put itself in position to try the question as to classification before the Board of General Appraisers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 F. 969, 83 C.C.A. 81, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tiffany-co-ca2-1907.