United States v. Tiffany & Co.
This text of 153 F. 969 (United States v. Tiffany & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The application to serve and file a supplemental and amended answer is denied, because we deem the application unnecessary, as. the Circuit Court has ample power to grant such relief, and to suspend the trial until the importer, by payment of the duties assessed, may put itself in position to try the question as to classification before the Board of General Appraisers.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 F. 969, 83 C.C.A. 81, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tiffany-co-ca2-1907.