United States v. Thornton

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Thornton

300 F. App'x 768

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided November 21, 2008·No. No. 07-10716·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Rick D. Collum, appointed counsel for James E. Thornton in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms that there are no issues of arguable merit on appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Thornton’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Rick D. Collum, appointed counsel for James E. Thornton in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms that there are no issues of arguable merit on appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Thornton’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Thornton, 300 F. App'x 768 (11th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

300 F. App'x 768 (United States v. Thornton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related