United States v. Thornton

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Thornton

300 F. App'x 768

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedNovember 21, 2008

DocketNo. 07-10716

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 300 F. App'x 768 (United States v. Thornton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Thornton, 300 F. App'x 768 (11th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Rick D. Collum, appointed counsel for James E. Thornton in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms that there are no issues of arguable merit on appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Thornton’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Rick D. Collum, appointed counsel for James E. Thornton in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms that there are no issues of arguable merit on appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Thornton’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

300 F. App'x 768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thornton-ca11-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack