United States v. Thorne

15 F. 739, 1883 U.S. App. LEXIS 2069
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedFebruary 9, 1883
StatusPublished

This text of 15 F. 739 (United States v. Thorne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Thorne, 15 F. 739, 1883 U.S. App. LEXIS 2069 (S.D.N.Y. 1883).

Opinion

Benedict, J.

This is a motion by the accused to be discharged on his own recognizance, or that his trial do immediately proceed. The ground of the application is that the accused was ready to be tried at the February term, and attended court during the term, and pressed the district attorney to try his case, but the district attorney omitted to call up the case, although the trial might have been had, and no sufficient reason existed for omitting to call up the case. The affidavits show that the accused was in court, pressing for a trial of his case at the February term, and I am by no means satisfied with the reasons assigned by the district attorney for his omission to call up the case. So far as the business of the court is concerned there was abundant opportunity to try the case at the February term, and I think it ought to have been called up. I do not, however, think it advisable to discharge the accused upon his own recognizance at this term. He is on bail, and the bail given will stand until the next term in March. If, at the opening of that term, an early day be not fixed by the district attorney for the disposition of the case, the present motion may be renewed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 F. 739, 1883 U.S. App. LEXIS 2069, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thorne-nysd-1883.