United States v. Thompson
This text of 6 F. App'x 127 (United States v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Joyce Torian Thompson appeals the district court’s denial of her motion to correct an illegal sentence, and motion to amend that motion. Our review of the record and the district court’s ruling discloses that this appeal from the district court’s order denying her motions is without merit. United States v. Thompson, No. CR-87-53 (E.D.N.C. filed Oct. 24, 2000; entered Oct. 30, 2000). Therefore, we affirm the district court’s ruling. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 F. App'x 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thompson-ca4-2001.