United States v. Thompson

71 M.J. 93, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 19
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedJanuary 5, 2012
DocketNo. 10-0649/AF
StatusPublished

This text of 71 M.J. 93 (United States v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Thompson, 71 M.J. 93, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 19 (Ark. 2012).

Opinion

CCA 37380. Review granted on the following issue:

WHETHER APPELLANT RECEIVED POST-TRIAL INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL AND APPELLANT HAS MADE A COLOR-ABLE SHOWING OF POSSIBLE PREJUDICE.

The decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals is set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for remand to an appropriate convening authority to order a hearing pursuant to United States v. DuBay, 17 C.M.A. 147, 37 C.M.R. 411 (1967), to make findings of fact and conclusions of law related to the granted issue. At the conclusion of the DuBay hearing, the record will be transmitted to the Court of Criminal Appeals for further review under Article 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 866 (2006). Thereafter, Article 67, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 867 (2006), shall apply. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. DuBay
17 C.M.A. 147 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 M.J. 93, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thompson-armfor-2012.