United States v. Thomasine Tynes

Third Circuit

United States v. Thomasine Tynes

913 F.3d 393

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJanuary 18, 2019

Docket14-4804

StatusPublished

This text of 913 F.3d 393 (United States v. Thomasine Tynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Thomasine Tynes, 913 F.3d 393 (3d Cir. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Richard L. Nygaard Circuit Judge

The petition for rehearing en banc filed by appellant Thomasine Tynes in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular service not having voted for rehearing, the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

The petition for rehearing by the panel is GRANTED IN PART, solely as to the claim that there was insufficient evidence to support Tynes' conviction.

After consideration of Appellant's argument, the panel has agreed to amend the opinion, which will be filed simultaneously with this order in all of the consolidated cases. Each of the judgments entered August 21, 2018, shall remain in full force and effect.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard L. Nygaard Circuit Judge

The petition for rehearing en banc filed by appellant Thomasine Tynes in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular service not having voted for rehearing, the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

The petition for rehearing by the panel is GRANTED IN PART, solely as to the claim that there was insufficient evidence to support Tynes' conviction.

After consideration of Appellant's argument, the panel has agreed to amend the opinion, which will be filed simultaneously with this order in all of the consolidated cases. Each of the judgments entered August 21, 2018, shall remain in full force and effect.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

913 F.3d 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thomasine-tynes-ca3-2019.