United States v. Thomas Ross

449 F. App'x 563
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 15, 2012
Docket11-1619
StatusUnpublished

This text of 449 F. App'x 563 (United States v. Thomas Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Thomas Ross, 449 F. App'x 563 (8th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Ross appeals the 120-month sentence the district court 1 imposed after granting the government’s motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b). He argues that the extent of the district court’s reduction did not adequately reflect his assistance to the government. This court lacks jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) to consider such a challenge to the district court’s ruling on a Rule 35(b) motion. United States v. Haskins, 479 F.3d 955, 957 (8th Cir.2007) (per curiam); United States v. Coppedge, 135 F.3d 598, 599 (8th Cir.1998) (per curiam). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

1

. The Honorable Richard Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ricky Coppedge
135 F.3d 598 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Austin A. Haskins
479 F.3d 955 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
449 F. App'x 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thomas-ross-ca8-2012.