United States v. Thomas Johnson
This text of United States v. Thomas Johnson (United States v. Thomas Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 18-2646 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Thomas Johnson
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Western Division ____________
Submitted: April 18, 2019 Filed: May 17, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________
Before SHEPHERD, MELLOY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
After his conditional guilty plea and sentencing on one count of production of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) and (e), Thomas Johnson appeals the district court’s1 denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Johnson sought to suppress evidence gained through a warrant issued in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. We have previously held the same warrant was void ab initio because it violated the Fourth Amendment. See United States v. Horton, 863 F.3d 1041, 1049 (8th Cir. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 1440 (2018). However, we also held the Leon good faith exception applied to Federal Bureau of Investigation agents’ use of the warrant. See id. at 1052. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Thomas Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thomas-johnson-ca8-2019.