United States v. Thomas F. Mills
This text of 223 F. App'x 516 (United States v. Thomas F. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[UNPUBLISHED]
Thomas Frederick Mills appeals his sentence following his guilty plea to escape from a federal correctional institution, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751(a), and theft of government property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. For reversal, Mills argues the district court 1 erred in concluding that his escape conviction was a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(2), resulting in his classification as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1.
As Mills acknowledges, this court has held that all escapes, even non-violent “walk-away” escapes, are crimes of violence within the meaning of section 4B1.2. See United States v. Nation, 243 F.3d 467, 472 (8th Cir.2001). We are bound to follow this precedent. See United States v. Wright, 22 F.3d 787, 788 (8th Cir.1994) (panel of this court is bound by prior Eighth Circuit decision unless prior decision is overruled by this court sitting en banc).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
223 F. App'x 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thomas-f-mills-ca8-2007.