United States v. Thomas Edward King, A/K/A Eddie
This text of 60 F.3d 826 (United States v. Thomas Edward King, A/K/A Eddie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
60 F.3d 826
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Thomas Edward KING, a/k/a Eddie, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-6061.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 22, 1995.
Decided July 11, 1995.
Thomas Edward King, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, WV, for Appellee.
N.D.W.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. King, Nos. CR-92-116; CA-94-104-2 (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 22, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 F.3d 826, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24918, 1995 WL 406605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thomas-edward-king-aka-eddie-ca4-1995.