United States v. Thomas Drumgold, II

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 23, 2023
Docket22-3636
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Thomas Drumgold, II (United States v. Thomas Drumgold, II) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Thomas Drumgold, II, (8th Cir. 2023).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 22-3636 ___________________________

United States of America,

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,

v.

Thomas Hannibal Drumgold, II,

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant. ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of North Dakota - Western ____________

Submitted: March 17, 2023 Filed: March 23, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________

Before COLLOTON, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Drumgold, II appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to a term of 12 months and 1 day in prison, followed by 24

1 The Honorable Daniel L. Hovland, United States District Judge for the District of North Dakota. months of supervised release. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief arguing that the sentence is substantively unreasonable.

Upon careful review, to conform to the statutory maximum punishment, we order the judgment amended as follows: Drumgold’s revocation prison sentence remains 12 months and 1 day, but his term of supervised release will be 24 months minus 1 day. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h). We affirm the judgment in all other respects. Drumgold’s sentence was not unreasonable, as there is no indication that the district court overlooked a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 922-23 (8th Cir. 2006); see also United States v. Elodio-Benitez, 672 F.3d 584, 586 (8th Cir. 2012). We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. ______________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Elodio-Benitez
672 F.3d 584 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Duane Larison
432 F.3d 921 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Thomas Drumgold, II, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thomas-drumgold-ii-ca8-2023.