United States v. Thomas

28 F. Cas. 78, 2 D.C. 36, 2 Cranch 36

This text of 28 F. Cas. 78 (United States v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Thomas, 28 F. Cas. 78, 2 D.C. 36, 2 Cranch 36 (circtddc 1811).

Opinion

But

the Court

(Fitzhugh, J., absent,)

said that, in a criminal case, parol evidence might be given to explain the intention, the quo animo, with which the deed was made, and to prove that the defendant only meant to sell his right to her service during the term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 F. Cas. 78, 2 D.C. 36, 2 Cranch 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thomas-circtddc-1811.