United States v. Thomas Chisholm Bartsh
7 F.3d 114, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26028
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 5, 1993·No. 92-1470·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The appellant’s petition for rehearing is granted in part. We adhere to our prior opinion in all respects except on the issue of the amount of restitution. Since the record is not clear on how much restitution was made to the government (in money or assets) before the restitution order was entered, the matter is remanded for the limited purpose of determining the amount of restitution paid, which should then be credited towards the restitution obligation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Thomas Chisholm Bartsh, 7 F.3d 114, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26028 (8th Cir. 1993).
7 F.3d 114 (United States v. Thomas Chisholm Bartsh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Jeremy Kelley
861 F.3d 790 (Eighth Circuit, 2017)
United States v. Thomas Chisolm Bartsh
69 F.3d 864 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)