United States v. Thomas
This text of United States v. Thomas (United States v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 21-20176 Document: 00516165576 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2022
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED January 13, 2022 No. 21-20176 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Trevien Kahlil Thomas,
Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:19-CR-640-1
Before Jones, Duncan, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Trevien Kahlil Thomas on appeal has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief that relies on Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Thomas has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record re- flected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 21-20176 Document: 00516165576 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/13/2022
No. 21-20176
presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from fur- ther responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Thomas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thomas-ca5-2022.