United States v. Thomas

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 13, 2022·No. 21-20176·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 21-20176 Document: 00516165576 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2022

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 13, 2022

No. 21-20176

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Trevien Kahlil Thomas,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:19-CR-640-1

Before Jones, Duncan, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Trevien Kahlil Thomas on appeal has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief that relies on Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Thomas has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

*

Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

Case: 21-20176 Document: 00516165576 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/13/2022

No. 21-20176

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Thomas, (5th Cir. 2022).

United States v. Thomas (United States v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)