United States v. Thomas
This text of 647 F. App'x 181 (United States v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Tommie Raymond Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to correct an alleged clerical error in his criminal judgment. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 36. Because there is no clerical error in Thomas’ criminal judgment, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Thomas, No. 3:03-cr-00173-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
647 F. App'x 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thomas-ca4-2016.