United States v. Thomas

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Thomas

550 F. App'x 160

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 14, 2014·No. No. 13-7328·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jerrell Antonio Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the filing of a motion for sentence reduction based on substantial assistance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Thomas, No. 2:94-cr-00069-RGD-3 (E.D.Va. Aug. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jerrell Antonio Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the filing of a motion for sentence reduction based on substantial assistance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Thomas, No. 2:94-cr-00069-RGD-3 (E.D.Va. Aug. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Thomas, 550 F. App'x 160 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

550 F. App'x 160 (United States v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.