United States v. Thomas
This text of 550 F. App'x 160 (United States v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jerrell Antonio Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the filing of a motion for sentence reduction based on substantial assistance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Thomas, No. 2:94-cr-00069-RGD-3 (E.D.Va. Aug. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
550 F. App'x 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thomas-ca4-2014.