United States v. Thomas

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
• Decided: January 8, 2003
• Docket: 01-4283
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Opinions of the United 2003 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

1-8-2003

USA v. Thomas Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket 01-4283

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003

Recommended Citation "USA v. Thomas" (2003). 2003 Decisions. Paper 893. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003/893

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2003 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT __________

NO. 01-4283 __________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

LISA THOMAS, Appellant ____________

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Pennsylvania D.C. No.: 99-cr-00722-1 District Judge: Honorable J. Curtis Joyner ____________

Argued: October 15, 2002

Before: BECKER, Chief Judge, ROTH, and ROSENN, Circuit Judges.

(Opinion filed December 31, 2002) ___________________________________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION ___________________________________

The slip opinion in the above case is hereby amended as follows:

1. On page 8, the first line of the first full paragraph, insert the word “only” after “considered.”

2. On page 8, in the first full paragraph, line 5, substitute “need” for “does.”

3. On page 10, line 8, insert “ Id. at 351.” after “promises.”

4. On page 16, footnote 4, line 5, delete “Furthermore” and begin the sentence with “Unlike.”

5. On page 23, line 4, remove the parenthesis before “cmt.” BY THE COURT:

/s/ Max Rosenn Circuit Judge

Dated: January 8, 2003