United States v. Thomas

43 F. App'x 443
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Thomas. Read the opinion of the Court — 303 F.3d 138
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided August 20, 2002·No. Docket No. 01-1263·Published

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Defendant Fermina Thomas appeals her conviction following a guilty plea to one count of possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of a substance containing a cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), 841(b)(l)(A)(iii). Thomas’s sole contention on appeal is that 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A) unconstitutionally requires a judge to determine the quantity of drugs for sentencing purposes, and that 21 U.S.C. § 841(b) is therefore unconstitutional on its face. Because a panel of this court recently rejected the same argument, U.S. v. Outen, 286 F.3d 622, 634-36 (2d Cir.2002), we affirm Thomas’s conviction and sentence.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Thomas, 43 F. App'x 443 (2d Cir. 2002).

43 F. App'x 443 (United States v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related