United States v. Thomas Brandon Bayer
This text of United States v. Thomas Brandon Bayer (United States v. Thomas Brandon Bayer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________
No. 98-2704EM _____________
United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Thomas Brandon Bayer, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _____________
Submitted: November 16, 1998 Filed: November 30, 1998 _____________
Before FAGG, BRIGHT, and BEAM, Circuit Judges. _____________
PER CURIAM.
Thomas Brandon Bayer appeals the sentence imposed on him following the revocation of his supervised release. Because Bayer raised no objection to the district court's sentence, we apply the test of plain error review. See United States v. Prendergast, 4 F.3d 560, 561-62 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam). The record shows the district court sentenced Bayer within the suggested guidelines imprisonment range,and well within the statutory maximum, thus we find no error in the district court's analysis, plain or otherwise. Additionally, Bayer's pro se motions for reconsideration of his sentence went beyond the district court's authority to correct a sentence for an arithmetical, technical, or other clear error. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(c). Accordingly, we affirm the district court.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Thomas Brandon Bayer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thomas-brandon-bayer-ca8-1998.