United States v. Thomas A. Birkel
This text of United States v. Thomas A. Birkel (United States v. Thomas A. Birkel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 99-2318 ___________
United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Thomas A. Birkel, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * ___________
Submitted: November 2, 1999 Filed: November 4, 1999 ___________
Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
Thomas A. Birkel pleaded guilty to one count of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). He moved for a downward departure under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b) and U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5K2.0, but the district court1 denied his motion and sentenced him to 57 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release. On appeal, Birkel argues that the court erred in declining to depart downward.
1 The HONORABLE RICHARD G. KOPF, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. The record demonstrates, and Birkel concedes, that the district court was aware of its authority to depart from the Guidelines, and declined to do so. Thus, the issue is unreviewable. See United States v. Turechek, 138 F.3d 1226, 1228 (8th Cir. 1998) (district court’s discretionary decision not to depart downward from Guidelines is unreviewable so long as court was aware of its authority to do so).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Thomas A. Birkel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-thomas-a-birkel-ca8-1999.