United States v. The Schooner Betsey & Charlotte
This text of 8 U.S. 443 (United States v. The Schooner Betsey & Charlotte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court considers the law as completely settled by the case of The Vengeance. A distinction has been attempted to be drawn between this case and that, but the court can see no difference. It is the place of seizure, and not the place of committing the offence, which decides the jux-isdiction.
It has been said, the word “including” means moreover, or, as well as j but if this was the meaning of the legislature, it was, a very embarrassing mode of expressing the idea. It is clear, that congress meant to discriminate between seizures on waters navigable from the sea, and seizures upon land or upon waters not navigable ; and to class the former among the civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction. The only doubt which could arise would be upon the clause of the constitution respecting the trial by jury. But the case of The Vengeance settles that point.
The sentence of the circuit court was reversed, and that of the district court affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 U.S. 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-the-schooner-betsey-charlotte-scotus-1808.