United States v. The Dago

61 F. 986, 10 C.C.A. 224, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2266
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 22, 1894
DocketNo. 67
StatusPublished

This text of 61 F. 986 (United States v. The Dago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. The Dago, 61 F. 986, 10 C.C.A. 224, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2266 (4th Cir. 1894).

Opinion

GOFF, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree rendered by the district court of the United States for the district of Maryland dismissing a libel tiled on behalf of the United States against the steamship Dago. It was charged in the libel that; the steamship had not complied with the provisions of the act of congress approved February 15, 1893, entitled “An act granting additional quarantine powers and imposing additional duties on the marine hospital service.” 37 Sta t. 449. It was a lleged that the Dago cleared from a, certain foreign port, (he port of Bristol, England, for the port of Baltimore, in the United Stales, on 1;he 10th of July, 1893, without having obtained a bill of health, as was required hv section 3 of said act of congress; and also that, having cleared and sailed from said port of Bristol at, the time mentioned, she did, on ihe 2d day of August, 1893, unlawfully enter the port of Baltimore, in the United States, without having obtained a bill of health, as was required by the said act of congress. The libel, which was filed August 5, 1893, sets forrli that the Dago was seized by the collector of customs at the port of Baltimore, as forfeited to the United States, to be released upon the payment, of not more than $5,000, the exact amount to be determined bv the court. The answer of die steamship, fled September 22, 1893, claimed that, she came to the port of Baltimore provided with a- bill of health in all respects in accord with the requirements of the law, obtained at ^Newport, in Wales, her last port of departure, from Great Britain, and she insisted that no other bill of health was required of her by the law.

The said act of congress, or the parts thereof necessary to consider in connection with this case, read as follows:

“That it shall be unlawful for any merchant ship or other vessel from any foreign port or place to enter any port; of Ihe United Htates except in accordance with the provisions of this act, and with such rules and regulations of state and municipal health authorities as may hi' made in pursuance of. or consistent with this act; and any such vessel which shall enter, or attempt to enter, a port of the United States in violation thereof, shall forfeit to the United Slates a sum, to be awarded in the discretion of the court, not exceeding live thousand dollars, which shall bo a lien upon said vessel, to be recovered by proceedings in ihe proper district court of the United States. In all such proceedings the United Slates district attorney for such district shall appear on behalf of the United States, and all such proceedings shall he conducted in accordance with the rules and laws governing cases of seizure of vessels for violation of the revenue laws of the United State's.
"Sec. 2. That any vessel nt any foreign port, clearing for any port or place in the United States, shall be required to obtain from the consul, vice-consul, or other consular officer of the United States at the port, of departure, or from the medical officer where such officer has been detailed by the president for that purpose, a bill of health, in duplicate, in the form prescribed by the secretary of the treasury, setting forth the sanitary history and condition of said vessel, and that it has in all respects complied with ihe rules and regulations in such case's prescribed for securing the best sanitary condition of the said vessel, its cargo, passengers, and crew; and said consular or medical officer is required, before granting such duplicate hill of health, to be satisfied that the matters and things therein stated are true; and for his services in that behalf .he shall he entitled to demand and receive such fees as shall by lawful [988]*988regulation be allowed, to be accounted for as is required in other cases. The president, in bis discretion, is authorized to detail any medical officer of the government to serve in the office of the consul, at any foreign port, for the purpose of furnishing information and making the inspection and giving the' bills of health hereinbefore mentioned. Any vessel clearing and sailing from any such port without such bill of health, and entering any port of the United States, shall forfeit to the United States not more than five thousand ■dollars, the amount to be determined by the court, which shall be a lien on the same, to be recovered by proceedings in the proper district court of the United States.
“Séc. 3. That the supervising surgeon-general of the marine hospital service shall, immediately after this act takes effect, examine the quarantine regulations of all state and municipal boards of health, and shall, under the direction of the secretary of the treasury, co-operate with and aid state and municipal boards of health in the execution and enforcement of the rules and regulations of such boards and in the execution and enforcement of the rules and regulations made by the secretary of the treasury to prevent the introduction of contagious or infectious diseases into the United States from foreign countries, and into one state or territory or the District of Columbia from another state or territory or the District of Columbia. * * * The secretary of the treasury shall make such rules and regulations as are necessary to be observed by vessels at the port of departure and on the voyagé, where such vessels sail from any foreign port or place to any port or place in the United States, to secure the best sanitary condition of such vessel, her cargo, passengers and crew; which shall be published and communicated to and enforced by the consular officers of the United States. None of the penalties herein imposed shall attach to any vessel or owner or officer thereof until a copy of this act, with the rules and regulations made in pursuance thereof, has been posted up in the office of the consul or other consular officer of the United States for ten days in the port from which said vessel sailed; and the certificate of such consul or consular officer over his official signature shall be competent evidence of such posting in any court of the United States.”

■ The only question in the case is, we think, whether or not the steamship Dago was required to obtain a bill of health at Bristol, England, at the time she cleared and departed therefrom for Baltimore, in the United States, by way of Newport, Wales. It was contended by the respondent below that, as she stopped on her way at Newport, it was only necessary to obtain a bill of health at that place. It was clearly shown by the testimony —in fact, it was admitted—that the Dago cleared from Bristol, England, via Newport, Wales, for Baltimore, in the United States, and that she was provided with a bill of health from the port of Newport, Wales, but that she did not obtain a bill of health at the port of Bristol at the time of departing therefrom, and also that she was not provided with one at the time she entered the port of Baltimore. The district court, holding that the Dago was not guilty of a breach of said act of congress, dismissed the libel. The United States petitioned for and was allowed an appeal.

The act mentioned was passed to prevent, if possible, the introduction into the United States of contagious and infectious diseases from any foreign port. It makes it unlawful for any vessel from any foreign port to enter any port of the United States except in the manner provided for by said legislation and the rules and regulations' established under its provisions; and it requires any vessel at any foreign port, clearing for any port in the United States, to obtain a bill of health at the port from which it so clears and de[989]*989parts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 F. 986, 10 C.C.A. 224, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-the-dago-ca4-1894.