United States v. Terry Pouncy

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Terry Pouncy

539 F. App'x 437

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedAugust 23, 2013

Docket12-31181, 12-31193, 12-31194

StatusUnpublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 539 F. App'x 437 (United States v. Terry Pouncy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Terry Pouncy, 539 F. App'x 437 (5th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to represent Terry Pouncy on appeal has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief that relies on Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Pouncy has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

The record does reveal two clerical errors in the judgment, which stated an of *438 fense of conviction as “conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute [cocaine],” where the indictment and the guilty plea recognized that offense of conviction as “possession with intent to distribute cocaine.” The judgment should be corrected to reflect that Pouncy was convicted of possession with intent to distribute. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 36. With respect to Count 8, the judgment should be corrected to reflect the right code number of 18 (rather than 21) U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). Id.

Accordingly, Pouncy’s counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and as to Pouncy only (Case No. 12-31181) his APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. His case is REMANDED for correction of the clerical errors pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.

*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to represent Terry Pouncy on appeal has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief that relies on Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Pouncy has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

The record does reveal two clerical errors in the judgment, which stated an of *438 fense of conviction as “conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute [cocaine],” where the indictment and the guilty plea recognized that offense of conviction as “possession with intent to distribute cocaine.” The judgment should be corrected to reflect that Pouncy was convicted of possession with intent to distribute. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 36. With respect to Count 8, the judgment should be corrected to reflect the right code number of 18 (rather than 21) U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). Id.

Accordingly, Pouncy’s counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and as to Pouncy only (Case No. 12-31181) his APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. His case is REMANDED for correction of the clerical errors pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.

*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

539 F. App'x 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-terry-pouncy-ca5-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack