United States v. Terry Joe Whittle

104 F.3d 364, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37461, 1996 WL 686147
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedDecember 2, 1996
Docket96-2480
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 104 F.3d 364 (United States v. Terry Joe Whittle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Terry Joe Whittle, 104 F.3d 364, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37461, 1996 WL 686147 (8th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

104 F.3d 364

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Terry Joe WHITTLE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-2480.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: November 22, 1996
Filed: December 2, 1996

Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

A jury found Terry Joe Whittle guilty of distributing methamphetamine, attempting to distribute methamphetamine, and conspiring to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. The district court1 sentenced Whittle to concurrent prison terms of 70 months and a total of five years of supervised release. Whittle appeals, arguing that the drug-quantity table in the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1(c) violates due process by requiring longer sentences for defendants involved with large amounts of low-purity methamphetamine than for those involved with small amounts of high-purity methamphetamine.

Whittle's argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Murphy, 899 F.2d 714, 717 (8th Cir.1990) (Sentencing Commission's decision to determine defendant's offense level on basis of entire weight of methamphetamine mixture satisfies due process; "basing sentencing on the quantity of drugs without regard to purity is reasonably related to the proper legislative purpose of penalizing large-volume drug traffickers more harshly." (internal quotations omitted)).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

1

The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 F.3d 364, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37461, 1996 WL 686147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-terry-joe-whittle-ca8-1996.