United States v. Terry Andrew Wilder

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Terry Andrew Wilder

37 F.3d 1497, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34944, 1994 WL 556935

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 12, 1994

Docket94-6070

StatusPublished

This text of 37 F.3d 1497 (United States v. Terry Andrew Wilder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Terry Andrew Wilder, 37 F.3d 1497, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34944, 1994 WL 556935 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

37 F.3d 1497
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Terry Andrew WILDER, Defendant Appellant.

No. 94-6070.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 14, 1994.
Decided Oct. 12, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-91-59, CA-93-111-7-BR)

Terry Andrew Wilder, appellant Pro Se.

Robert Daniel Potter, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Raleigh, NC, for appellee.

E.DN.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wilder, Nos. CR-91-59; CA-93-111-7-BR (E.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

37 F.3d 1497
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Terry Andrew WILDER, Defendant Appellant.

No. 94-6070.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 14, 1994.
Decided Oct. 12, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-91-59, CA-93-111-7-BR)

Terry Andrew Wilder, appellant Pro Se.

Robert Daniel Potter, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Raleigh, NC, for appellee.

E.DN.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wilder, Nos. CR-91-59; CA-93-111-7-BR (E.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 F.3d 1497, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34944, 1994 WL 556935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-terry-andrew-wilder-ca4-1994.