United States v. Terrini Griffin

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedDecember 31, 2020
Docket20-2652
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Terrini Griffin (United States v. Terrini Griffin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Terrini Griffin, (8th Cir. 2020).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 20-2652 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Terrini Trenise Griffin

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central ____________

Submitted: December 28, 2020 Filed: December 31, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Terrini Trenise Griffin appeals after the district court1 revoked her most recent grant of conditional release and sentenced her to four months in prison, followed by

1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. eighteen months of supervised release. Her counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief, asserting that Griffin’s sentence of incarceration with supervised release is substantively unreasonable.

We note that Griffin was released from federal prison on October 16, 2020. We conclude that her revocation sentence is not moot, see United States v. Melton, 666 F.3d 513, 514 n.3 (8th Cir. 2012), and that the revocation prison term and supervised release term were both substantively reasonable. The district court sufficiently considered the relevant statutory sentencing factors and did not give significant weight to an improper factor or commit a clear error of judgment. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a), 3583(e); United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 917 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). Furthermore, the prison term was below the applicable policy statement range in the Guidelines, see United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 464 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc), and both terms were below the statutory limits, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(b)(2), (e)(3), (h).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. ______________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Nathan Melton
666 F.3d 513 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Miller
557 F.3d 910 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Feemster
572 F.3d 455 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Terrini Griffin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-terrini-griffin-ca8-2020.