United States v. Terrence A. Lewis

816 F.2d 674, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 4792, 1987 WL 37050
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 10, 1987
Docket86-7403
StatusUnpublished

This text of 816 F.2d 674 (United States v. Terrence A. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Terrence A. Lewis, 816 F.2d 674, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 4792, 1987 WL 37050 (4th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

816 F.2d 674

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Terrence A. LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 86-7403.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 3, 1987.
Decided April 10, 1987.

Before HALL, PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

Terrence A. Lewis, appellant pro se.

Breckinridge Long Willcox, Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.

PER CURIAM:

In United States v. Lewis, No. 84-5311 (4th Cir., April 25, 1986) (unpublished), we upheld the conviction of Terrence Lewis for (1) kidnapping; (2) transmitting in interstate commerce a demand for ransom or reward for the kidnapping victim's release; and (3) aiding and abetting. Lewis then requested "the Minutes and Notes Transcribed of the Jury Charge and Instructions to the Jury." Lewis's stated purpose of the request was "for 'ancillary' matters as provided for in Title 18, U.S.C. (Criminal Justice Act)." The district court denied the request, and we affirm.

In United States v. MacCollom, 426 U.S. 317 (1976), the Supreme Court addressed the question of furnishing free transcripts under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 753(f) to indigent prisoners asserting claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The Court noted that the statute presupposes the filing of a Sec. 2255 motion. Id. at 321. As Lewis has filed no such motion, the denial of the requested portions of the transcript was not error.

As the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. MacCollom
426 U.S. 317 (Supreme Court, 1976)
United States v. Urrutia (Jose Santo)
816 F.2d 674 (Fourth Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
816 F.2d 674, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 4792, 1987 WL 37050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-terrence-a-lewis-ca4-1987.