United States v. Terrance Pargo

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
• Decided: May 31, 2024
• Docket: 24-1141
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 24-1141 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Terrance Leon Pargo

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central ____________

Submitted: May 28, 2024 Filed: May 31, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________

Before SMITH, BENTON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Terrance Pargo appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to a term above the advisory Sentencing Guidelines range. His

1 The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief challenging the substantive reasonableness of the sentence.

We conclude that the sentence was not an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Valure, 835 F.3d 789, 790 (8th Cir. 2016) (standard of review). There is no indication that the district court failed to consider a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment. See United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923 (8th Cir. 2006) (considerations for reasonableness of sentence); United States v. Michels, 49 F.4th 1146, 1148-49 (8th Cir. 2022) (sentence above Guidelines range was not abuse of discretion).

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm the judgment. ______________________________

-2-