United States v. Terrance Brown, Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 28, 2018
Docket18-4726
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Terrance Brown, Jr. (United States v. Terrance Brown, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Terrance Brown, Jr., (4th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-4726

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TERRANCE NATHANIEL BROWN, JR., a/k/a War, a/k/a War Stone, a/k/a Luciano,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:17-cr-00150-RGD-RJK-2)

Submitted: November 21, 2018 Decided: November 28, 2018

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrance Nathaniel Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Terrance Nathaniel Brown, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his “motion to challenge jurisdiction” filed in his pending criminal prosecution. * This

court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and

certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order

Brown seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral

order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* Although the parties have not yet filed merits briefs in this appeal and the Government has not formally moved to dismiss it, we are obliged to inquire, even sua sponte, into matters implicating our own jurisdiction. See United States v. Bullard, 645 F.3d 237, 246 (4th Cir. 2011).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)
United States v. Bullard
645 F.3d 237 (Fourth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Terrance Brown, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-terrance-brown-jr-ca4-2018.