United States v. Teodoro Blanco-Heras
This text of 94 F. App'x 432 (United States v. Teodoro Blanco-Heras) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Teodoro Blanco-Heras (Blanco) pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture containing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1), and 846. The district court 1 sentenced him to 135 months in prison and 5 years supervised release. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has filed a brief in which he challenges the severity of Blanco’s sen *433 tence and suggests the district court should have departed downward.
We reject counsel’s arguments. First, the length of Blanco’s sentence does not provide a basis for reversal, as it is within a Guidelines range that Blanco does not contest. See 18 U.S.C. § 3742; United States v. Smotherman, 326 F.3d 988, 989 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 293, 157 L.Ed.2d 203 (2003). Second, Blanco did not request a departure below, and the district court was not required to grant one sua sponte.
Following our independent review, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300(1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel permission to withdraw.
. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 F. App'x 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-teodoro-blanco-heras-ca8-2004.