United States v. Tenorio

197 F.2d 905, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2708
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedJune 5, 1952
Docket4424_1
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 197 F.2d 905 (United States v. Tenorio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Tenorio, 197 F.2d 905, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2708 (10th Cir. 1952).

Opinion

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.

The United States brought this action against Tenorio for statutory damages under § 205 of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended, 1 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1895, and restitution of rent overcharges under the provisions of § 206(b) of the Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 1896(b). From a judgment for Tenorio, the United States has appealed.

The facts are not in dispute. Tenorio leased the housing accommodations involved for the period from January 1, 1949, to January 1, 1950, to his daughter, Matilda Lovato, and charged and collected a rental of $40 per month. The maximum legal rent for such period was $15 per month.

The rental was paid by the Denver. Bureau of Public Welfare on behalf of Lovato.

Under the facts, the United States was entitled to judgment for at least the amount of the overcharges collected and received within one year preceding the filing of the suit, which was for $50. 2

Relief by way of restitution is equitable in nature and should be granted or withheld in accordance with traditional equity principles and practices, as conditioned by the necessities of the public interest, which the Act seeks to protect. 3

In awarding restitution the court may take into consideration as one of the circumstances the amount of damage claimed and awarded the United States. 4

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the views herein expressed.

1

. Hereinafter called the Act.

2

. United States v. Carter, 10 Cir., 197 F.2d 903.

3

. United States v. Carter, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fancher v. Clark
127 F. Supp. 452 (D. Colorado, 1954)
De La Tierre v. Edmonson
214 F.2d 956 (Seventh Circuit, 1954)
Thomas v. United States
200 F.2d 686 (First Circuit, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 F.2d 905, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-tenorio-ca10-1952.