United States v. Tellez

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Tellez

286 F. App'x 244

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 13, 2008·No. 07-51043·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

After reviewing the briefs and the record, and listening to the able oral arguments, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in its application of U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(c)(3)’s cross-reference to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1. The charged conduct falls within the ambit of both 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2) and 8 U.S.C. § 1185(a)(2). However, the district court should have stated under which statutory provision the *245 conduct fell, and we urge the district courts to do so in the future.

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

After reviewing the briefs and the record, and listening to the able oral arguments, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in its application of U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(c)(3)’s cross-reference to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1. The charged conduct falls within the ambit of both 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2) and 8 U.S.C. § 1185(a)(2). However, the district court should have stated under which statutory provision the *245 conduct fell, and we urge the district courts to do so in the future.

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States v. Tellez, 286 F. App'x 244 (5th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

286 F. App'x 244 (United States v. Tellez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related