United States v. Ted H. Kimball

914 F.2d 1386, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 16833
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ted H. Kimball. Read the opinion of the Court — 896 F.2d 1218
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 21, 1990·No. 87-1392·Published

Opinion

914 F.2d 1386

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ted H. KIMBALL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 87-1392.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 21, 1990.

Prior report: 9th Cir., 896 F.2d 1218.

Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, BROWNING, WALLACE, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ted H. Kimball, 914 F.2d 1386, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 16833 (9th Cir. 1990).

914 F.2d 1386 (United States v. Ted H. Kimball) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Ted H. Kimball
896 F.2d 1218 (Ninth Circuit, 1990)