United States v. Taylor

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Taylor. Read the opinion of the Court — 272 F. Supp. 3d 127
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided December 1, 2016·No. Criminal No. 2010-0006·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA F I L E D ) nEc 1- 2016 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) C|erk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy ) Courts for the Dlstr|ct of Columb|a ) v. ) Case No: 10-cr-0006-RCL ) ALTON D. TAYLOR ) ) ) Defendant. ) )

M

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Robinson, and the lack of objection thereto, the Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

By separate order this date, defendant’s term of supervised release Will be revoked. The minimum sentence under the guidelines of 24 months incarceration Will be imposed, Which the guidelines provide Will be consecutive to the Maryland sentence currently being served. No additional term of supervised release Will be imposed. The Court finds the recommended guideline sentence is appropriate, having considered all of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors.

The motion [22] to lift detainer is GRANTED, and the Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Prosequendum is now dismissed.

lt is SO ORDERED.

Date: M_f_, 2016 a am

Roycé/@. Lamberth United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Taylor, (D.D.C. 2016).

United States v. Taylor (United States v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Imposition of a sentence
18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)