United States v. Taylor

10 C.M.A. 621, 10 USCMA 621, 28 C.M.R. 187, 1959 CMA LEXIS 235, 1959 WL 3436
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedAugust 21, 1959
DocketNo. 13,131
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 10 C.M.A. 621 (United States v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Taylor, 10 C.M.A. 621, 10 USCMA 621, 28 C.M.R. 187, 1959 CMA LEXIS 235, 1959 WL 3436 (cma 1959).

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

GeoRGe W. Latimer, Judge:

This a companion case to our decision in United States v Smith, 10 USCMA 619, 28 CMR 185, decided this date, and the facts are substantially similar, both accused having been questioned by the same Federal Bureau of Investigation agent at the same place and at approximately the same time. The accused here pleaded guilty to one specification of absence without leave and not guilty to a specification of possession of a false pass with intent to deceive. After trial by general court-martial, he was found guilty of both offenses and sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement at hard labor for one year. The convening authority approved the sentence, but the board of review, after affirming the findings of the absence without leave offense, set aside the conviction for possession of a false pass and approved only so much of the sentence as provided for a bad-conduct discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement at hard labor for six months.

The Judge Advocate General of the Army has certified for our determination the same issue with which we were confronted in the Smith case, supra, and for the reasons we there set forth, the certified question is answered in the negative. That part of the board of review’s decision setting aside the findings of guilty of possession of a false pass is reversed, and the record is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for reference to a board of review for action not inconsistent with this opinion.

[622]*622Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Lake
17 C.M.A. 3 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1967)
United States v. Souder
11 C.M.A. 59 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 C.M.A. 621, 10 USCMA 621, 28 C.M.R. 187, 1959 CMA LEXIS 235, 1959 WL 3436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-taylor-cma-1959.