United States v. Taylor
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 23, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41413 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAMES MICHAEL TAYLOR, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-03-CR-465-1 --------------------
Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent James
Michael Taylor, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw from this
direct appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Taylor has received a copy of
counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue in this appeal. Accordingly, the motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Taylor (United States v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.