United States v. Taylor

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Taylor. Read the opinion of the Court — 179 F.3d 303
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 24, 1998·No. 97-40143·Unpublished

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 97-40143 _____________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

JESSE GEORGE TAYLOR,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (6:96-CR-22-21) ______________________________________________________

April 13, 1998

Before GARWOOD, DAVIS and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In this direct criminal appeal Taylor argues that the district

court erred by:

1. sentencing him based on distribution of crack cocaine instead of powder cocaine;

2. allowing Taylor’s post-guilty plea statements to be used at sentencing to establish his base offense level;

3. allowing a co-conspirator’s hearsay statement to be used at sentencing to establish his base offense level.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. After reading the briefs and reviewing pertinent portions of

the record, we are persuaded that the district court committed no

reversible error.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Taylor, (5th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Taylor (United States v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.